Circular economy in business, management, and accounting: A bibliometric study of the construct
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.4.07.a3Keywords:
circular economy, business performance, management, accounting, sustainabilityAbstract
Context. Studying and applying the Circular Economy (CE) is becoming a trend and its presence is increasing as a business model that can balance achieving business objectives and preserving the well-being of future generations through the company's positive impact on the environment.
Problem. This study is crucial for understanding the global landscape of CE research, pinpointing influential factors in highly cited works, and guiding future research initiatives. The findings will contribute to shaping the direction of academic endeavors in Circular Economy and supporting informed decision-making for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners invested in sustainable practices. The research aims to investigate the evolution of CE research in key geographic regions, understand the pivotal drivers and performance measures influencing the most cited research articles in this domain, and identify crucial future research directions. "The research problem aims to investigate a central question and its specific dimensions. The primary inquiry is: 'How has the field of Circular Economy (CE) evolved and become more significant, particularly about business models and increasing environmental awareness?' This general question is then broken down into three specific research questions: How has the volume of CE research evolved based on key geographic regions? What types of key CE drivers and performance measures relate to the most cited research articles? What are the most important future research directions in the field of CE research?
Purpose. The main purpose of this research was to further examine the study methods of the Circular Economy, specifically within the fields of business, management, and accounting. The goal was to highlight the current trends and directions of research related to the CE. This information is intended to guide current and future research on key issues in corporate sustainability.
Methodology. The process used as a method is through a bibliometric review of scientific articles on CE published in the Scopus database, analyzing the period from 2008 to 2023. Co-occurrence maps of circular economy keywords, titles and summaries were created. Representation networks were carried out with the bibliometric analysis software VOSviewer, version 1.6.8 (Van & Waltman, 2018).
Theoretical and Practical Findings. The main theoretical contribution revealed a significant and steadily accelerating volume of academic interest in the field of CE and its relevance on business contexts. And, as a practical contribution, it was found that future research should focus not only on quantitative bibliometric analysis but also on the qualitative aspects to fully comprehend the development and direction of this crucial field.
Transdisciplinary and sustainable innovation originality. The proposed research is valuable and innovative because it acknowledges that the discourse on CE is not a static field but an evolving conversation. This evolution is shaped by the ongoing interaction of research, business practices, policy-making, and societal needs. Recognizing the dynamic nature of the CE conversation, the proposed research aims to make a significant contribution by monitoring and analyzing emerging trends.
The ability to adapt and respond to the ongoing interactions between research, business practices, policies, and societal needs ensures that the findings of this research are relevant and applicable in a constantly changing context. Furthermore, the research goes beyond merely analyzing the evolution of the CE conversation; it also seeks to identify the key factors driving it. By highlighting these fundamental drivers, the research can shed light on critical areas that require attention and guide the future development of the CE.
Conclusions and limitations. Therefore, the increasing pace of publications and citations signals not only the growth of the field but also the increasing urgency and significance of transitioning towards a CE in a world grappling with the dual challenge of economic development and environmental sustainability.
Downloads
References
Albarracín, E. J. G., & de Lema, D. G. P. (2011). Impacto de la cultura intraemprendedora en
el rendimiento de las MIPYME del sector turístico colombiano: Un estudio empírico. Investigación y Ciencia: de la Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, (52), 27-36. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4034405
Allevi, E., De Giuli, M. E., Domínguez, R., & Oggioni, G. (2023). Evaluating the role of waste-to-energy and cogeneration units in district heatings and electricity markets. Computational Management Science, 20(1), 5.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-023-00437-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-023-00437-3
Camón, E., & Celma, D. (2020). Circular economy. A review and bibliometric
analysis. Sustainability, 12(16), 6381.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166381
Cobo, M., López‐Herrera, A., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology,62(7), 1382-1402.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Cheah, S., Ho, Y. P., & Li, S. (2018). Business model innovation for sustainable performance in
retail and hospitality industries. Sustainability, 10(11), 3952.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113952
Da Costa Pimenta, C. C. (2022). La Economía Circular como eje de desarrollo de los países latinoamericanos. Revista Economía y Política, (35), 1-18. http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/pdf/rep/n35/2477-9075-rep-35-00001.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.25097/rep.n35.2022.01
D'Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., ... & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of cleaner production, 168, 716-734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
De Angelis, R., Howard, M., & Miemczyk, J. (2018). Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 425-437.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF, 2012). Towards the circular economy. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2012). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. EMAF: Cowes, UK. Consulted on October 5, 2023.
https://www.werktrends.nl/app/uploads/2015/06/Rapport_McKinsey-Towards_A_Circular_Economy.pdf
Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., & Xue, B. (2012). Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: an evaluation and critical analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 23(1), 216-224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005
Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 190, 712-721.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 757-768.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344-357.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular econ-omy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environ-mental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Gupta, H., Kumar, A., & Wasan, P. (2021). Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126253.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253
Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018). A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 278-311.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141
Goyal, S., Chauhan, S., & Mishra, P. (2021). Circular economy research: A bibliometric analysis (2000–2019) and future research insights. Journal of cleaner production, 287, 125011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125011
Jabbour, C. J. C., Fiorini, P. D. C., Wong, C. W., Jugend, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Seles, B. M. R. P., & da Silva, H. M. R. (2020). First-mover firms in the transition towards the sharing economy in metallic natural resource-intensive industries: Implications for the circular economy and emerging industry 4.0 technologies. Resources Policy, 66, 101596.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101596
Klein, N., Deutz, P., & Ramos, T. B. (2022). A survey of Circular Economy initiatives in Portuguese central public sector organizations: National outlook for implementation. Journal of Environmental Management, 314, 114982.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114982
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544-552.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111
Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy–beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045
Lucky, E. O. I. (2011). The conceptual framework of the effect of location on performance of small firms. Asian Social Science, 7(12), 110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n12p110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n12p110
Melgarejo, Z., Ciro, D., & Simón Elorz, K. (2019). Determinantes clave en el debate teórico sobre crecimiento empresarial. Criterio Libre, 18 (31), 275-296. http://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2019v18n31.6142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2019v18n31.6142
Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703-722.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112
Moed, H., & Glänzel, W. (2005). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Kluwer Academic Publishers
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9
Mont, O. (2008). Innovative approaches to optimising design and use of durable consumer goods. International Journal of Product Development, 6(3-4), 227-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2008.020395
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112
Morales, L. E. (2020). Capital intelectual y desempeño organizacional: el caso de las instituciones de educación básica en México. Pensamiento y Gestión, 47, 180-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14482/pege.47.6342
http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/pege/n47/2145-941X-pege-47-180.pdf
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of business ethics, 140, 369-380.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
Nuñez, P., Górecki, J., Molina-Moreno, V., & Corpas-Iglesias, F. A. (2018). What gets measured, gets done: Development of a circular economy measurement scale for building industry. Sustainability, 10(7), 2340.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072340
Pinzón-Castro, S. Y., & Maldonado-Guzmán, G. (2023). Los Efectos de la Innovación Abierta en la Eco-innovación y el Rendimiento Empresarial en las Empresas Manufactureras de México. Scientia et PRAXIS, 3(06), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.3.06.a1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.3.06.a1
Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605-615.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224
Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2018). Creating value in the circular economy: A structured multiple-case analysis of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 988–1000.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072
Secundo, G., Del Vecchio, P., Dumay, J., & Passiante, G. (2017). Intellectual capital in the age of big data: establishing a research agenda. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 242-261.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2016-0097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2016-0097
Shad, M. K., & Lai, F. W. (2019). Enterprise risk management implementation and firm performance: Evidence from the Malaysian oil and gas industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(9), 47-53.
https://doi.org/10.5539/IJBM.V14N9P47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n9p47
Soto, H. S., & Pinzón, S. (2023). Eco-innovación y Responsabilidad Social Empresarial: Un estudio bibliométrico de la relación de estos constructos. Scientia et PRAXIS, 3(5), 34-59.
https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.3.05.a2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.3.05.a2
Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 215-227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020
Todeschini, R., y Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969
Tsai, K. H., & Liao, Y. C. (2017). Sustainability Strategy and Eco-Innovation: A Moderation Model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 426–437.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1926
Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Chiesa, V. (2017). Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047
United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP (2021), Planetary Action, UNEP in 2021, Environment Program. Consulted on September 10, 2023.
https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/37946/UNEP_AR2021.pdf
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual.
https://www. vosviewer. com/documentation. Man ual_VOSviewer_1, 6.
Wamba, S. F., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015). How ‘big data’can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 234-246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031
World Economic Forum’s 2020 Global Risks Report (WEF, 2020). Retrieved January 15, 2024, from:
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risk_Report_2020.pdf
World Trade Organization (WTD, 2021). Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions. Ministerial Statement On Trade And Environmental Sustainability. Consulted on September 8, 2023.
https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/MIN21/6R2.pdf&Open=True
Yusuff, Y. Z., Mohamad, M., & Ab Wahab, N. Y. (2019). The influence of general self-efficacy on women entrepreneurs. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(2), 1-6. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-influence-of-general-selfefficacy-on-women-entrepreneurs-8120.html
Zeng, X., Ogunseitan, O. A., Nakamura, S., Suh, S., Kral, U., Li, J., & Geng, Y. (2022). Reshaping global policies for circular economy. Circular Economy, 1(1), 100003.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2022.100003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2022.100003
Župić, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aura Andrea Díaz-Duarte, Gabriel Purón-Cid, José Jaime Sainz-Santamaria, Marco Eliseo Rivera-Martínez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
