Basic elements of review
Core Review Criteria
Reviewers at Scientia et PRAXIS assess submitted manuscripts based on the following core criteria, in alignment with the journal’s editorial approach:
-
Thematic relevance to the editorial axes, the innovation concepts of the Oslo Manual, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
-
A clear and well-defined problem statement, grounded in a precise context, that enables the development of a solid narrative from a multidisciplinary perspective focused on innovation for sustainable development. The author or authors must present an original and unpublished contribution that rigorously articulates theoretical foundations, a robust methodology, and a critical discussion of findings (both theoretical and practical) leading to well-supported conclusions and relevant recommendations.
-
Explicit contribution to sustainable innovation across technological, social, economic, or environmental dimensions.
-
Ethical commitment and appropriate use of artificial intelligence tools, in accordance with COPE and UNESCO recommendations.
-
Methodological clarity and coherence, grounded in scientific justification.
-
Originality regarding innovation for sustainable development as the focus of the proposal and its applicability..
-
Theoretical contribution (Scientia): strengthening academic and conceptual knowledge.
-
Practical contribution (Praxis): demonstrable applicability in social, institutional, or technological contexts.
-
Recency and quality of references, with at least 90% of sources published within the last 5 to 10 years, formatted in APA 7th edition.
-
Academic writing clarity, coherence, and structural integrity of the manuscript.
-
Originality verification using iThenticate (recommended similarity index ≤10%).
-
Compliance with the Author Guidelines, including eght structured sections.
-
Final recommendation, based on academic observations: accept, revise, or reject.
