Distinguishing Ecological Economics from Environmental Economics, Green Economy, Circular Economy, and Bioeconomy in the 21st Century

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.5.09.a4

Keywords:

bibliographic databases, meta-analysis, paradigms, environment, economy, ecological economics

Abstract

Context. In the 21st century, several economic-environmental approaches —such as ecological economics, environmental economics, green economy, circular economy, and bioeconomy— have emerged to address the increasing complexity of sustainability challenges. These frameworks stem from different historical, regional, and disciplinary contexts and reflect diverse interpretations of the relationship between the economy and the environment.

Problem. Although they share a common concern for sustainability, these approaches often overlap in terminology and scope, generating conceptual ambiguity and reducing their analytical clarity and policy relevance. The central question is: what distinguishes ecological economics from other paradigms in the 21st century?

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to differentiate ecological economics from other contemporary approaches that analyze the relationship between economy and environment. It reviews 21st-century scientific literature to establish conceptual similarities and differences, focusing on theoretical foundations and keywords.

Methodology. A meta-analysis was conducted on peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus between 2000 and 2020. Author-defined keywords were analyzed in terms of frequency, co-occurrence, and exclusivity to identify conceptual patterns among the five approaches.

Theoretical and Practical Findings. Ecological economics is distinguished by its emphasis on biophysical limits, social metabolism, political ecology, and distributional conflicts. Theoretically (Scientia), it helps delimit paradigmatic boundaries; practically (Praxis), it guides public policies and academic programs with a critical perspective on sustainability and justice.

Originality. The study applies a multidisciplinary approach that contrasts market-based models with an ecological paradigm centered on justice. It proposes “ecologizing the economy” rather than “economizing ecology.”

Conclusions and Limitations. Ecological economics emerges as a distinct and necessary paradigm. Its main limitation is the exclusive use of English-language sources. Future research should incorporate multilingual and participatory methodologies to expand this comparative framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Claudio Passalía, Universidad Nacional del Litoral.CONICET. Santa Fé, Argentina

Research Professor at the Universidad Nacional del Litoral.CONICET. Santa Fé, Argentina

Guillermo Peinado

Ph.D. in Social Sciences, Master in Political Economy, and Bachelor in Economics, with experience in research adopting a transdisciplinary approach in the field of the relationships between economy, environment, and society. The focus is particularly on peripheral economies and the sustainability of their development styles.

References

Acta Ecológica (n.d.).Portal web. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/acta-ecologica-sinica

Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. (n.d.). Portal web. https://www.aere.org/about-aere

Atondo-García, F. G., Huesca-Reynoso, L., & Llamas-Rembao, L. (2025). Towards a Healthy and Sustainable Economy: The Impact of Tobacco Taxes on Social Equity and Public Health in Mexico. Scientia Et PRAXIS, 5(09), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.5.09.a1

Barkin, D., Fuente, M. & Tagle, D. (2012). La significación de una Economía Ecológica radical. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 19(1),1-14. https://redibec.org/ojs/index.php/revibec/article/view/194

Baumgärtner, S. & Özkaynak, B. (n.d.) Ecological Economics. Elsevier. Retrieved Feb-17-2025, from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ecological-economics

Boulding, K. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. New York. Retrieved Feb-17-2025, from:https://arachnid.biosci.utexas.edu/courses/thoc/readings/boulding_spaceshipearth.pdf

Cavalcanti, C. (2010). Conceptions of Ecological Economics: its Relationship with Mainstream and Environmental Economics. Estudos Avançados, 24(68), 53-67.https://www.scielo.br/j/ea/a/vTMxPYD5vKCJ4fj7c5Q9RbN/?format=pdf&lang=en

Costanza, R., Stern, D., Fisher, B., He, L., Ma, C. (2004) Influential publications in ecological economics: A citation analysis. Ecological Economics, 50, 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.001

Daly, H., & Farley, J. (2004). Ecological economics: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Island Press. https://islandpress.org/books/ecological-economics-second-edition#desc

Daly, H. (1977). Steady state economy. The Economics of Biophysical and Moral Growth. San Francisco: W.F. Freeman. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2241892

Díaz-Duarte, A. A., Purón-Cid, G., Sainz-Santamaria, J. J., & Rivera-Martínez, M. E. (2024).Circular economy in business, management, and accounting: A bibliometric study of the construct. Scientia Et PRAXIS, 4(07), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.4.07.a3

Dobson, A. (1997). Pensamiento político verde. Una nueva ideología para el siglo XXI. Paidós. https://www.solidaridadobrera.org/ateneo_nacho/libros/Andrew%20Dowson%20-%20Pensamiento%20politico%20verde.pdf

ECLAC (n.d.). Portal web. https://www.cepal.org/es

ECLAC (2021, August 26). Progress towards a circular economy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Challenges and opportunities for a more sustainable, low-carbon development style [Event]. https://www.cepal.org/en/events/progress-towards-circular-economy-latin-america-and-caribbean-challenges-and opportunities

Ellen MacArthur Foundation (n.d.). Portal web. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org

Elsevier (n.d.). Ecological Economics. International Society for Ecological Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ecological-economics

EMBRAPA (2023). Bioeconomy initiatives. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation. https://www.embrapa.br/en/bioeconomia

European Commission (2018). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society, and the environment: Updated bioeconomy strategy. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1f0d851f-e718-11e8-b690-01aa75ed71a1

European Commission (2020). A new circular economy action plan: For a cleaner and more

competitive Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0098

European Commission & European Economic and Social Committee (n.d.). European Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform. https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/

FAO (n.d.). Sustainable and circular bioeconomy for agrifood systems transformation. FAO. https://www.fao.org/in-action/sustainable-and-circular-bioeconomy/en

FAO (2021). Towards sustainable bioeconomy guidelines: Shaping the bioeconomy in Latin America and the Caribbean. FAO. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb4712en/

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. London: Harvard

University Press. https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~lozada/Adv_Resource_Econ/En_Law_Econ_Proc_Cropped_Optimized_Clearscan.pdf

Google. (n.d.). Google Books Ngram Viewer.Retreved 23-Marc-2025, from: https://books.google.com/ngrams

Green Economy Coalition (n.d.).Portal web .https://www.greeneconomycoalition.org/

Hoepner, A., Kant, B., Scholtens, B. & Yu, P. (2012), Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals,authors and institutions. Ecological Economics, (77), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002

International Advisory Council on Global Bioeconomy (2023). One Planet – Bioeconomy Solutions for Global Challenges [Statement from the international workshop on global and local bioeconomies, Hanover, Germany, June 26–27, 2023]. IACGB Publications. https://www.iacgb.net/PUBLICATIONS

International Society for Ecological Economics (n.d.). we portal retrieved Jan-2-2025, from:https://www.isecoeco.org/

INTA. (2022). Bioeconomía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. https://inta.gob.ar/temas/bioeconomia

Knowledge Policy Bioeconomy Platform (n.d.) Portal web. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/bioeconomy

López-Calderón, A., Passalía, C., Lozeco, J. & Tarragona, M. (2013). La evolución histórica del pensamiento económico y su visión de la naturaleza en el proceso social de producción, in Pengue, W. & Feinstein, H. (Eds.), Nuevos enfoques de la economía ecológica, Buenos Aires, Lugar Editorial.https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/110075

Ma, C. & Stern, C. (2006). Environmental and ecological economics: A citation analysis. Ecological Economics, (58), 491– 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.023

Melgar-Melgar, R. E., & Hall, C. A. S. (2020). Why ecological economics needs to return to its roots: The biophysical foundation of socio-economic systems. Ecological Economics, (169). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106567

OECD. (2012). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The consequences of inaction. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264122246-en

OECD. (2022). Green growth and sustainable development. https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/

Pigou, a. (1920). Economics of welfare. London: Macmillan Press.https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/pigou-the-economics-of-welfare

Pigou, A. C. (1929). A Study in Public Finance. Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.81768

Ramos-Gorostiza, J. L. (2005). Medio natural y pensamiento económico: historia de un reencuentro. Principios: estudios de Economía Política, (2), 47-70. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1172986&orden=189895&info=link

REDBioLAC. (n.d.). Red Latinoamericana de Bioeconomía. https://redbiolac.bio

Resources for the Future. (2023). Economics of environmental policy. https://www.rff.org/

Revista de Iberoamericana Economía Ecológica (n.d.). Portal web.https://redibec.org/ojs/index.php/revibec

Sandmo, A. (2015). The Early History of Environmental Economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, (9), 1, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu018

Soriano-Sandoval, J. L., & Alarcón-Sánchez, K. M. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives with a strategic approach to eradicate the phenomenon of Greenwashing. Scientia Et PRAXIS, 2(04), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.2.04.a1

Spash, C. L., (2020). A tale of three paradigms: Realising the revolutionary potential of ecological economics, Ecological Economics, (169). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518

Scopus (2025). Database. Retrieved Feb-02-2025, from: https://www.scopus.com

United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

United Nations Environment Programme. (n.d.). UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/

United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=126&menu=35

Van den Bergh, J. (2001). Ecological economics: themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics. Regional Environmental Change, (2), 13-23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s101130000020

World Bank. (n.d.). Portal web. https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/home

Zhu, J., & Hua, W. (2017). Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis”, Scientometrics, (110), 893–914. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-016-2187-8

Published

2025-06-28

How to Cite

Passalía, C., & Peinado, G. . (2025). Distinguishing Ecological Economics from Environmental Economics, Green Economy, Circular Economy, and Bioeconomy in the 21st Century. Scientia Et PRAXIS, 5(09), 75–113. https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.5.09.a4

Issue

Section

Scientific Articles