El Capital Intelectual y el Impacto Social de la Innovación Tecnológica para la Valuación de Patentes

Ricardo de Jesús  Nuño-Velasco; Juan Mejía-Trejo

doi:10.55965/setp.2.04.a4

Authors

Ricardo de Jesús Nuño-Velasco Assistant Professor B https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-4260
Juan Mejía-Trejo Titular-Research Professor https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-1943

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.2.04.a4

Keywords:

Valuation, Intellectual Capital, Social Impact, Intangible and Patents

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the structure of knowledge based on graphics and the evolution of the valuation of innovation patents in public research centers. The final document is a product of VOSviewer software to analyze the availability of innovation patent valuation records in the Scopus Databases from the years 2000 to 2022.

Methodology. This document is valuable because it shows a description of the scientific articles in the Scopus databases analyzed with the software VOSviewer (Bibliometric Analysis) software by country, educational institution, and author, with emphasis on the evolution of research on the subject in question. Finally, a visualization map cited references and co-citation analysis is provided to spot the knowledge base at the forefront of innovation.

Findings and Originality. This chapter is an approach to the state of the art of innovation patent valuation research in public research centers. It also demonstrates a structure of visual knowledge and the evolution of the topic in question. It also provides an important reference for academics to visualize the current situation and collaborative trends in this subject.

Theoretical contribution. The results show how intellectual capital is one of the main factors when valuing innovation patents, but in practice, only traditional cost-focused methods are used.

Practical contribution. When intellectual capital is included in the valuation of innovation patents, the intangible aspects of the patent are better covered, obtaining a more accurate valuation than with a traditional valuation focused on costs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ricardo de Jesús Nuño-Velasco, Assistant Professor B

Born in 1987 in Guadalajara, Jalisco.
Professional experience:
Participant in the microwave project with the companies Telcel and NEC-Emac, 2011-2012.
Coordinator in the FACEJ trust of the alliance for the countryside in the state of Jalisco in the Secretary of Rural Development SEDER, 2013 - 2019.
Academic of the University of Guadalajara at the University Center of Biological and Agricultural Sciences C.U.C.B.A., 2015.
Academic experience:
Graduated in the career of Engineering in Communications and Electronics at the University of Guadalajara in the C.U.C.E.I., 2005-2010.
Obtaining a Master's degree in Finance at the Values Center, 2014-2015.
Currently a student of the Doctorate in Administration Sciences at the University of Guadalajara C.U.C.E.A., 2019.

Juan Mejía-Trejo, Titular-Research Professor

He is born in 1964 in CDMX, México.

As professional experience:

1986-1987. Quality Department Control in Korai Electrónica S.A.

1987-2008. Former Internal Plant Exploitation Manager at Teléfonos de México S.A.B. Western Division.

As academic experience :

1987. He earned his degree in Communications and Electronics Engineering from the Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (ESIME at the IPN)

2004. He earned his master’s in Telecommunications Business Administration from INTTELMEX and France Telecom.

2010. He earned his doctorate in Administrative Sciences from the Escuela Superior de Comercio y Administración (ESCA at the IPN)

2011.He is a member of the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) Level I of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) , México.

2010 to the present, he is Titular Research Professor B at the Department of Marketing and International Business at the Universidad de Guadalajara, México.

2015-2022.He earned the Coordination of the Doctorate in Management Sciences at the Universidad de Guadalajara.

2019.He earned Level II of the SNI/CONACYT

2019.He is a member of the AMIDI(Academia Mexicana de Investigación y Docencia en Innovación).

2020. He earned his master’s in Valuing Business in the Centro de Valores S.C. México.

His line of research is Innovation Management, publishing articles and books that can be found on the Internet.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-1943

Email: jmejia@cucea.udg.mx

References

Asociación para la difusión y generación de conocimiento sobre la medición y gestión del impacto social (ESIMPACT, 2022 ). Impacto Social. https://www.esimpact.org/impacto-social/

Bernal, R. A. (2019). Valuadores piden legislación para su reconocimiento: CE Noticias Financieras. Content Engine LLC, a Florida limited liability company, 1–2. https://www.pressreader.com/panama/la-estrella-de-panama/20190823/281668256633047

Cárdenas-Salazar, P. J. (2021). Revisión Bibliométrica de la Gestión del Conocimiento Tradicional. Scientia et PRAXIS, 1 (1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.1.01.a4

Chen, H., Jiang, W., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., y Man, X. (2017). State of the art on food waste research: a bibliometrics study from 1997 to 2014. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140 (2), 840-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.085

Chunlei, Ye., (2018). Bibliometrical Analysis of International Big Data Research: Based on Citespace and VOSviewer: 14th International Conference on Natural Computation. Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. DOI: 10.1109/FSKD.2018.8687153

Corrado, C., Haskel, J., Jona-Lasinio, C., y Iommi, M. (2018). Intangible investment in the EU and US before and since the Great Recession and its contribution to productivity growth: Journal of Infrastructure. Policy and Development, 2(1), 11-36. DOI:10.24294/jipd.v2i1.205

Global Intangible Finance Tracker (GIFT, 2018). Informe anual del valor de los intangibles en el mundo: Global Intangible Finance Tracker (GIFT), Brand Finance. https://brandirectory.com/download-report/GIFT%20-%20ESP.pdf

González-Ramos, A. M., González de la Fe, T., Peña-Vázquez, R., Bonnet-Escuela, M., y Van Oostrom, M. (2006). La dificultad de medición de los elementos intangibles del sistema de ciencia y tecnología. Empiria Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 12, 111. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.12.2006.1139

Haskel, J., y Westlake, S. (2018). Capitalism without capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691175034/capitalism-without-capital

Mas, M., Quesada, J., y Pascual, F. (2019). Mapa del talento en España 2019: Cómo lo generan, atraen y retienen las comunidades autónomas. Fundación Cotec para la innovación, València, Ivie. https://docplayer.es/125113721-Mapa-del-talento-en-espana-como-lo-generan-atraen-y- retienen-las-comunidades-autonomas.html

Mas, M. (2020). El crecimiento de la productividad y los activos intangibles. Papeles De Economía Española, 164, 41-59. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2428567948?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true

Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. (2022). OMPI: Patentes.https://www.wipo.int/patents/es/

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (OECD, 2019). OECD Stats. https://stats.oecd.org

Pandit, D., Joshi, M. P., Sahay, A., y Gupta, R. K. (2018). Disruptive innovation and dynamic capabilities in emerging economies: evidence from the Indian automotive sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 129, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.035

Radnejad, A., y Vredenburg, H. (2019). Disruptive technological process innovation in a process- oriented industry: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 53, 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.08.001

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: an Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Consultado el 23-Nov-2022. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674879904

Smith, A. (1996). Investigación sobre la naturaleza y causas de la riqueza de las naciones: Junta de Castilla y León, 1(12).

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12371/4443

Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations. Consultado el 23-Nov-2022, de:

https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140370713

Tiantian, S., Xiaoming M., y Waheed, A. (2019). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of disruptive innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2018-0056

Tidd, J., y Bessant, J. (2021). Managing Innovation Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 7th Ed. Wiley. Consultado el 22-Nov-2022.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344237753_Managing_Innovation_Integrating_Technological_Market_and_Organizational_Change

Tyfield, D. (2018). Innovating innovation-disruptive innovation in China and the low-carbon transition of capitalism. Energy Research and Social Science, 37, 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.024

Visconti, R. A. (2009). El capital intelectual concepto-valuación y registro contable. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Consultado el 22-Nov-2022. http://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/985/1/00519.pdf

Waltman, L., Eck, N., y Noyons, E. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002

Yu, D., y Hang, C. C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x